Legal

GLBA Compliance Statement

Margie — Pre-Underwriting Analysis Platform
Effective Date: March 22, 2026 · Last Updated: March 22, 2026

1. Purpose and Scope

This GLBA Compliance Statement describes how Margie (“we,” “us,” “our”), operating the pre-underwriting analysis platform at getmargie.com (the “Platform”), complies with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLBA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 6801–6809, and its implementing regulations, including the FTC Safeguards Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 314) as amended.

Margie operates as a service provider to licensed Illinois mortgage brokers. In this capacity, we receive, process, and store nonpublic personal information (“NPI”) of mortgage loan applicants (borrowers) on behalf of our broker clients. This statement documents our information security program, safeguards, and compliance measures.

2. GLBA Applicability to Margie

2.1 Regulatory Framework

The GLBA requires financial institutions to protect the security and confidentiality of customers' NPI. While Margie is not itself a financial institution, we process NPI on behalf of financial institutions (licensed mortgage brokers) and therefore maintain safeguards consistent with the GLBA's requirements.

Under the FTC Safeguards Rule (as amended effective June 9, 2023), service providers that receive NPI from financial institutions are required to maintain appropriate safeguards. Our broker clients are obligated under the GLBA to ensure that their service providers — including Margie — maintain adequate protections. This statement documents how we meet those obligations.

2.2 Categories of NPI Processed

The Platform processes the following categories of NPI contained in borrower documents:

3. Information Security Program

Margie maintains a written information security program designed to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of NPI. The program addresses the following elements as required by the FTC Safeguards Rule.

3.1 Designated Qualified Individual

In accordance with 16 C.F.R. § 314.4(a), Margie has designated a qualified individual responsible for overseeing, implementing, and enforcing the information security program. As a pre-revenue startup, Margie's founder currently serves in this capacity. As the company scales, this responsibility will transition to a dedicated security professional. The designated individual conducts periodic reviews of the security program and documents material security events.

3.2 Risk Assessment

We conduct and document periodic risk assessments that identify reasonably foreseeable internal and external risks to the security, confidentiality, and integrity of NPI, and assess the sufficiency of existing safeguards to control those risks. Risk assessments are updated at least annually and whenever material changes are made to the Platform's architecture or third-party service providers.

3.3 Safeguard Design and Implementation

Based on our risk assessments, we have designed and implemented the safeguards described in this statement. These safeguards address the identified risks and are regularly tested and monitored for effectiveness.

4. Technical Safeguards

4.1 In-Memory Processing Architecture

Margie's most significant technical safeguard is its in-memory-only document processing architecture:

This architecture means that even in the event of a full database compromise, an attacker would not gain access to original borrower documents, only to derived analysis results.

4.2 Encryption

4.3 Access Controls

4.4 Rate Limiting and Abuse Prevention

Upstash Redis enforces rate limiting on API endpoints and user actions to prevent brute-force attacks, credential stuffing, and platform abuse. Rate limits are configured to permit normal business use while blocking automated attack patterns.

4.5 Monitoring and Logging

5. Third-Party Service Provider Oversight

5.1 Due Diligence

Before engaging any third-party service provider that will process NPI, we evaluate the provider's security practices, certifications, and compliance posture. We prioritize providers that maintain recognized security certifications (such as SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, or FedRAMP authorization).

5.2 Contractual Safeguards

We maintain data processing agreements or equivalent contractual arrangements with each third-party provider that processes NPI. These agreements require the provider to:

5.3 Provider-Specific Safeguards

Azure Document Intelligence (Microsoft): Documents are transmitted to Azure for OCR processing over encrypted channels. Azure processes documents in real time and does not retain document content after the processing request is fulfilled. Microsoft maintains SOC 2 Type II compliance and operates under their enterprise data protection commitments.

Anthropic Claude: Extracted document data is transmitted to Anthropic for narrative analysis. Under Anthropic's Commercial Terms of Service, data submitted through the API is contractually prohibited from being used for model training. Anthropic's standard commercial terms include an absolute prohibition: “Anthropic may not train models on Customer Content from Services.” Data may be retained for up to 7 days for service delivery and automated safety monitoring. Anthropic maintains SOC 2 Type II compliance.

Google Gemini: Extracted document data is transmitted to Google for automated field population. Under Google Cloud's Service Specific Terms, customer data processed through paid API services is contractually prohibited from being used for model training. This protection applies automatically when accessing the Gemini API through a Cloud Project with an active billing account. Data may be temporarily retained for automated abuse monitoring. Google maintains SOC 2 Type II compliance, ISO 27001 certification, and FedRAMP authorization.

Google Firebase (Firestore & Authentication): Analysis results and user authentication data are stored in Firebase, which is part of Google Cloud Platform. Firebase Firestore provides encryption at rest and in transit, access control through security rules, and data isolation. Google Cloud maintains SOC 2 Type II compliance, ISO 27001 certification, and FedRAMP authorization.

Stripe: Payment processing is handled by Stripe, a PCI DSS Level 1 certified payment processor. Margie does not store full payment card numbers. Stripe processes billing data in accordance with PCI DSS requirements.

Upstash Redis: Upstash processes rate-limiting metadata (user identifiers and request counts), not borrower NPI. Upstash maintains SOC 2 Type II compliance.

Sentry: Sentry receives error logs and technical metadata for application monitoring. Our Sentry integration is configured with data scrubbing rules to prevent borrower NPI from being included in error reports.

6. Incident Response

6.1 Incident Response Plan

Margie maintains an incident response plan for detecting, responding to, and recovering from security events that may compromise NPI. The plan includes:

6.2 Notification Obligations

In the event of a security incident involving unauthorized access to NPI, we will:

7. Data Minimization and Retention

7.1 Data Minimization

Consistent with the GLBA's principles and the FTC Safeguards Rule, we minimize the collection and retention of NPI:

7.2 Retention Schedule

Data CategoryRetention PeriodStorage Location
Original borrower documentsNot retained (in-memory processing only)Volatile memory (purged on completion)
Structured analysis resultsDuration of account + 30 days post-terminationFirebase Firestore (encrypted at rest)
User account informationDuration of account + as required for legal/tax purposesFirebase Firestore (encrypted at rest)
Authentication logs12 monthsApplication logging infrastructure
Payment recordsAs required by tax and financial recordkeeping lawsStripe (PCI DSS compliant)
Error logs (Sentry)90 daysSentry (NPI excluded via data scrubbing)

7.3 Disposal

When NPI is no longer needed, it is disposed of securely:

8. Employee Training and Access

8.1 Personnel Security

Margie currently operates as a solo-founded startup. System access to production infrastructure, databases, and third-party service configurations is limited exclusively to the founder. All production access uses multi-factor authentication and follows the principle of least privilege.

8.2 Background Checks

As the team grows, all personnel granted access to systems that process or store NPI will be required to:

9. Program Evaluation and Reporting

9.1 Ongoing Monitoring

The information security program is subject to continuous monitoring, including:

9.2 Annual Review

The information security program is reviewed at least annually, and updated as necessary to address:

9.3 Reporting

The designated qualified individual provides a written report to Margie's leadership at least annually, covering:

10. Cooperation with Broker Clients

10.1 Due Diligence Support

We recognize that our broker clients have their own GLBA compliance obligations, including oversight of their service providers. We will cooperate with reasonable due diligence requests from broker clients, including:

10.2 Regulatory Cooperation

In the event of a regulatory examination or inquiry concerning a broker client's use of Margie, we will cooperate with the broker and their regulator to the extent required by law, including providing information about our data processing practices and safeguards.

11. Regulatory References

This compliance statement is informed by and designed to satisfy the requirements of:

12. Contact Information

For questions regarding this GLBA Compliance Statement or Margie's information security program, contact:

Margie
Email: contact@getmargie.com
Website: getmargie.com